Florida Law Creates ‘Suspicion’ Of Chinese Students And Faculty, Lawsuit Says

Last May, Florida passed SB 846 as part of a package of bills “protecting American interests from foreign threats.” It aimed to defend the U.S.’s intellectual and economic interests against being exploited by individuals tied to countries viewed as threats.

A state law restricted the students from China and six other countries from getting employes as graduate assistants for conducting academic researches. Two students and a professor from Florida International University and University of Florida respectively filed aa lawsuit.

Additionally, the controversy flared into a major legislative action after a lawsuit against SB 846 was filed.

The lawsuit declares that the law unfairly obstructs career advancement and discriminates against Chinese nationals and others associated with certain countries who work or want to work in Florida’s academic environments.

Challenging Suspicion In Academia: The Lawsuit Against SB 846

The suit was filed by Professor Zhengfei Guan, along with two doctoral candidates at Florida International University, Zhipeng Yin and Zhen Guo.

It claims that SB 846 violates federal law by overriding immigration and employment regulations even after people comply with existing national security measures.

Their plight originated directly from this law. The delayed assistantship approvals led to new financial burdens, which stood in the way of academic advancement and research productivity at a critical point in their careers.

This situation brings to mind questions about possible violations of constitutional rights based on nationality.

Hurdling Obstacles: Personal Impacts Of Florida’s SB 846 On Academics

Under SB 846, Zhengfei Guan experienced severe hiring delays, threatening his research and funding during a critical review period. Zhipeng Yin and Zhen Guo met with delayed educational support, which forced them to pay out-of-pocket; further, Guo was denied critical lab access.

According to them, the contentious law has strained their purses and affected their academic progress. It has directly impacted their contribution to critical research fields in Florida.

They were told that it would take months to approve their positions, Moreover, during this time they will not get any benefits which is around $40,000 per academic year. This is the amount a graduate teaching assistantship offers as per the court documents.

The SB 846 law outraged the UF faculty as well as the students. Around 400 UF faculty members signed the petition protesting against the law. The UF’s Student Senate also condemned the bill in February and the effects it has on international graduate students.

Another former student senator, Asif Islam, co-authored the resolution saying, “SB 846 is blatantly discriminatory, and there is no reason to not stand against it.”

He further added, “UF’s ability to be a top-tier research institution is largely because of our exceptional graduate researchers, many of whom are from these ‘nations of concern.’”

Designated Countries And Legal Forums

SB 846 designates China, North Korea, Iran, Russia, Syria, Cuba, and Venezuela as countries of concern.

It seeks to protect U.S. interests from perceived foreign threats by restricting academic collaborations with nationals of these countries unless they are U.S. citizens or permanent residents.

The policy also concerns federal law violations against discrimination against national origin. Plaintiffs claim that it violates established immigration standards and the rights of international academics who have already cleared through hi-tech federal security screens.

They filed a 33-page complaint claiming the law “improperly acts as a state veto over issues subject to the exclusive federal power over immigration law.”

It violates employment rights that are “predominant and superior federal power, such as national security and foreign affairs, and which in this instance the federal government is managing through its exclusive immigration power.”

Moreover, the complaint said, “SB 846 facially uses domicile as a proxy for improper discriminatory prohibitions in federal employment rights that are actually based on national origin, alienage, race, and ethnicity, disproportionately burdening individuals from China.”

Different universities are also preparing demonstrations on campus to support the Chinese scholars’ rights in higher education institutions.

Wider Implications For Academic Excellence And Integrity

The implications of SB 846 extend beyond individual hardships and affect the broader academic community. Under this legislation, universities often cannot hire or retain the most qualified candidates if they are from the listed countries of concern.

For example, Professor Zhengfei Guan had to wait four months to hire a top candidate from China. The student eventually took an offer from elsewhere due to the constraints of this law.

Such cases mean a large reduction in academic collaboration and innovation. It is much needed to further research and keep the integrity and competitiveness of U.S. educational institutions at a global level.

Various other Universities are also giving demonstrations to support the Chinese scholars’ rights at various other higher education institutions.

Chinese Students and Scholard Association and University of Florida Student Association at UF published a statement supporting the lawsuit against SB 846 and rebuked the state law and the reaction of the school.

Legal Landscape And Future Prospects For SB 846

The lawsuit against SB 846 marks the latest milestone in determining the constitutionality of state-passed, immigration–related legislation.

Traditionally, this type of legislation targeting specific nationalities has had to grapple with issues of constitutional legitimacy regarding equal protection under the law, such as Arizona’s SB 1070.

“The current case will likely turn on interpretations of discrimination and preemption by federal law. As it unfolds, its outcome could set influential precedents affecting policy-making and academic freedom nationwide,” says immigration lawyer Mario Godoy.

It could also redefine state-level authority over foreign affiliations in academia. This ultimately forces a reevaluation of how best to balance national security with international scholars’ vital contributions to America’s educational and research landscape.

Read Also:

• Having an Employment Law Attorney is a Blessing During THESE Times!
• Florida Employment Laws: A MUST-HAVE Guide to Your Workplace Rights
• Top Law Firms in Florida You MUST Keep in Mind!