Why Is HexClad Facing A Lawsuit?

HexClad, the fashionable hybrid cookware brand, got famous in a few years, one can say, after setting a stainless steel + non-stick perfect design, daring marketing, and catching the eye of celebrity chefs like Gordon Ramsay who have endorsed it.

The brand was characterized by a promise of longevity, a “forever” warranty, and hassle-free, non-toxic cooking. However, some lawsuits have been filed recently, which have thrown the brand’s claims into question.

Users claim that HexClad products were not non-toxic or PFAS-free as the manufacturer had advertised which resulted into a $2.5 million class-action settlement in 2025. This scandal has put the spotlight on bigger issues of cookware advertising and consumer trust.

In this article, I will talk about the following things:

• What is HexClas?
• About the HexClad Lawsuit.
• The major allegations in the HexClad Lawsuit.
• What is the eligibility for the HexClad lawsuit settlement?

Additionally, I will also tell you how the company responded to the lawsuit. Therefore, if these are some of the things that you want to know, then keep on reading this blog till the end…

What Is HexClad?

HexClad is marketed as “the first hybrid cookware,” combining stainless steel durability with non-stick convenience. Its laser-etched hexagonal surface allows for stainless and nonstick zones on the same pan.

Why did it become popular? Here are some of the major events that contributed to the popularity of the brand:

• Celebrity endorsements: Gordon Ramsay, among others, partnered with HexClad and showcased the cookware on TV.
• Marketing strategies: Ads emphasized “non-toxic,” “metal utensil safe,” and “lifetime warranty.”
• Premium positioning: Sold as a safer, better-performing alternative to Teflon and traditional nonstick pans.

The brand rode a wave of health-conscious marketing, but those same claims are now at the heart of litigation.

What Is The HexClad Lawsuit About?

In 2023–2024, multiple lawsuits were filed against HexClad in California. Consumers alleged that the company misrepresented its cookware as “non-toxic” and “PFAS-free” even though it contained PTFE (a type of PFAS).

• Lead case: Cliburn v. One Source to Market, LLC d/b/a HexClad filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
• Settlement: In 2025, HexClad agreed to pay $2.5 million to resolve the allegations.
• Who filed: Consumers who purchased HexClad cookware between Feb. 12, 2022: Mar. 25, 2024.

What Were The Key Allegations In The HexClad?

According to several sources, the HexClad class action lawsuit originated from allegations that the representations of the cookware were deceptive to buyers. As per official court documents, a study mentioned that there were certain toxicities related to the usage of PTFE.

Just as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), the lawsuit against HexClad maintained that the latter belongs to the same family of substances as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These are known to cause severe health problems and environmental pollution.

Here are the major allegations in the lawsuit:

False advertising	Claims that products were “non-toxic,” “PFAS-free,” and “safe for metal utensils” when PTFE (a PFAS) was allegedly present.
Warranty issues	“Lifetime warranty” claims were allegedly misleading; consumers reported warranty denials and short product lifespans.
Deceptive pricing	Marketing emphasized premium prices based on safety claims, allegedly amounting to unjust enrichment.
Safety concerns	Plaintiffs argued consumers wouldn’t have paid as much if they knew PTFE was included.

These allegations centered not only on health risks but also on trust and transparency.

How Did The Company Respond To The Allegations?

HexClad has denied wrongdoing. In its settlement notice, the company stated it agreed to the $2.5 million deal only to “avoid the costs and uncertainties of litigation.”

Steps HexClad has taken after the class action lawsuit:

• Agreed to stop using “non-toxic” and “PFAS-free” claims on affected products.
• Clarified product materials in marketing.
• Continued to uphold a “lifetime warranty,” though many customers report limitations in practice.

What Is The HexClad Lawsuit Settlement?

For customers, the lawsuit means potential refunds and lessons in product skepticism. Here’s what you need to know about the settlement eligibility:

What Is The Settlement Eligibility?

“To receive a cash payout from the $2,500,000 HexClad settlement, eligible class members must submit a valid claim form by November 14, 2025,” according to ClassAction.org.

Here are some oif the important dates that are related to the HexClad lawsuit:

• Applies to customers who bought HexClad cookware between February 2022 and March 2024.
• Claim deadline: Nov. 14, 2025.
• Opt-out deadline: Aug. 5, 2025.
• Fairness hearing: Sept. 15, 2025.

Read Also: Why Is Life 360 Facing A Lawsuit?

Which Products Are Eligible For This Settlement?

According to their official settlement page, here are the HexClad products that are eligible:

• 1 QT Hybrid Pot Lid.
• Hybrid Fry Pan 7”.
• 8” HexClad Hybrid Pan.
• 10” HexClad Hybrid Pan.
• 10” Hybrid Wok.
• 12” HexClad Hybrid Pan.
• 12” Hybrid Wok.
• 14” HexClad Hybrid Pan with Lid.
• 14” Hybrid Wok with Lid.
• Hybrid Griddle Pan 12”.
• Hybrid Griddle Pan 13”.
• 5 QT Saucepan.
• HexClad Hybrid 1 QT Pot With Lid.
• HexClad Hybrid 10 QT Stock Pot With Lid.
• Hybrid Deep Sauté Pan with Lid 5.5QT.
• HexClad Hybrid 2 QT Pot With Lid.
• HexClad Hybrid 3 QT Pot With Lid.
• Hybrid Deep Sauté Pan/Chicken Fryer with Lid 7QT.
• HexClad Hybrid 8 QT Pot With Lid.
• HexClad Hybrid 10 QT Stock Pot With Lid.

Apart from these, here are some of the other products that are inkluded in this list:

“Any sets in which any of the HexClad Hybrid pans are included, such as:

• the Hybrid Perfect Pots & Pans Set (12 PC).
• 13 PC HexClad Hybrid Cookware Set.
• 6 PC HexClad Hybrid Cookware Set.
• 20 PC HexClad All-In Bundle.
• Complete Kitchen Bundle.
• HexClad Ultimate Everything Collection.
• Essentials Bundle.
• Level-Up Bundle; Starter Bundle.
• Family Pasta Bundle.
• Any such variations of any sets that included the pans sold with or without a lid.

How Much Could You Get From The HexClad Lawsuit Settlement?

Number of Claims Filed	Approximate Payout Per Person*
10,000	$150 each
25,000	$60 each
50,000	$30 each

*Estimates after legal/admin costs; actual payout depends on claims submitted.

Consumers are also re-evaluating whether to trust “lifetime warranty” promises, with many turning to third-party testing and reviews before buying cookware.

Read Also: What Is The CCG Denver Restaurant Service Charge Lawsuit About?

What Is The HexClad Lawsuit Update?

• Case status: Settlement is preliminarily approved by the court. Final approval hearing is pending.
• If approved: Funds will be distributed in 2025.
• If rejected: Litigation could proceed to trial, with risk of higher damages.

According to Legal experts note this case could set a precedent for how cookware brands market themselves, particularly with regard to PFAS claims (Top Class Actions).

What Is The Public Reaction To The HexClad Lawsuit?

• Customer reviews: Many on the BBB cite peeling, discoloration, and warranty rejections.
• Social media: Reddit and Facebook threads discuss the lawsuit and whether HexClad is worth its premium price.
• Industry impact: Competitors are doubling down on independent certifications and lab testing to avoid similar legal scrutiny.

This backlash shows how brand reputation can unravel quickly when trust is breached.

What Should Consumers Keep In Mind?

The HexClad case underscores the importance of consumer vigilance:

• Don’t rely solely on marketing: terms like “non-toxic” may not have legal definitions.
• Check warranties carefully: “lifetime” often has restrictions (e.g., excludes normal wear and tear).
• Document everything: receipts, product issues, and communications matter in claims.
• Look for certifications: third-party lab results or regulatory compliance are more reliable than self-marketing.

The lawsuit against HexClad underlines the very thin boundary between advertising and lying. Although the company continues to assert its innocence, the settlement of $2.5 million indicates that consumers’ worries about their safety and the truthfulness of the product cannot be brushed off.

For consumers, the message is very clear: it is imperative to check the veracity of the outrageous claims about the durability and safety of the cookware before you throw your money at it. As for the industry, the lawsuit acts as an alarm that honesty in advertising is a must-have, not a choice.

Maybe the controversy won’t overshadow the benefits of HexClad for a lot of people, but the narrative always comes back: in the kitchen and the market, trust is as valuable as quality.